Skip to main content
VA Horizon
Book a Call
Statistics

CAN-SPAM Enforcement Statistics for Agencies Running Cold Email on Behalf of Clients 2026

Quick answer

The FTC’s largest CAN-SPAM Act penalty on record went to Verkada Inc. in 2024, a $2.95 million settlement filed by the Department of Justice in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, over more than 30 million commercial emails sent across a three-year period with no functioning opt-out mechanism, unhonored unsubscribe requests, and no physical postal address in the emails themselves. A year earlier, Experian Consumer Services, doing business as ConsumerInfo.com, paid $650,000 to settle a similar FTC and DOJ action, for sending marketing emails disguised as account or transactional notices to consumers who had signed up only to manage their credit report, without a clear opt-out mechanism.

Both cases matter to an agency running email campaigns on a client’s behalf specifically because CAN-SPAM liability cannot be handed off to whoever operates the sending tool, a rule this site’s own CAN-SPAM guide already covers in detail alongside the maximum per-email penalty figure. The FTC’s total CAN-SPAM enforcement history is commonly cited as roughly 169 cases since the law’s 1999 passage, an average of roughly 6 to 7 cases a year. This research could not independently verify that count against a single directly loaded FTC page, so it is presented here as a commonly repeated figure rather than a hard-sourced one.

The Two Largest Recent Settlements

Verkada Inc. paid $2.95 million in 2024 to settle FTC and DOJ CAN-SPAM Act claims, filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, the largest such penalty on record. The case covered more than 30 million commercial emails sent across a three-year period, with violations including no functioning opt-out mechanism, unsubscribe requests that went unhonored, and no physical postal address included in the emails.

Experian Consumer Services, doing business as ConsumerInfo.com, settled a similar FTC and DOJ action in 2023 for $650,000. The underlying conduct was sending marketing emails disguised as account or transactional notices to consumers who had signed up specifically to manage their own credit report, without a clear opt-out mechanism, and the settlement required Experian to build an Email Preference Center into every marketing communication it sends going forward.

The Agency’s Own Exposure When Sending on a Client’s Behalf

Both settlements above targeted the business whose products were being marketed, not an outside email platform or agency partner. That reflects a rule this site’s own CAN-SPAM guide already covers: liability under the Act cannot be outsourced to an ESP, a cold-email tool, or an agency partner, regardless of who operates the sending infrastructure. An agency running a client’s cold email campaign is running exactly this exposure, on the client’s behalf, whenever it is acting as the sender of record.

The FTC’s total enforcement record is commonly cited at roughly 169 CAN-SPAM cases since the law took effect in 1999, an average of roughly 6 to 7 cases a year across more than two decades. This research could not trace that specific count to a single directly loaded FTC page, given the FTC’s own site returned a bot-protection block on every attempted fetch this session, so treat it as a widely repeated figure worth confirming directly rather than a page-verified statistic.

The Numbers

1

Verkada Inc. paid $2.95 million in 2024 to settle FTC and DOJ CAN-SPAM Act claims, the largest such penalty on record, over more than 30 million commercial emails sent across a three-year period.

CyberInsider, “FTC Settles with Verkada on $2.95 Million for CAN-SPAM Act Violations”

2

Verkada’s violations included no functioning opt-out mechanism, unsubscribe requests that went unhonored, and no physical postal address included in the emails.

CyberInsider, “FTC Settles with Verkada on $2.95 Million for CAN-SPAM Act Violations”

3

Experian Consumer Services (ConsumerInfo.com) paid $650,000 in 2023 to settle a similar FTC and DOJ action, for sending marketing emails disguised as account or transactional notices to consumers managing their credit report, without a clear opt-out mechanism.

Perkins Coie, “FTC Reaches $650,000 Settlement With Experian Over Unsolicited Emails”

Sources

The external data in this article draws on the sources below. Figures described in the text as estimates or industry triangulations are directional and are not attributed to a single dataset.

FAQ

What is the largest CAN-SPAM penalty on record?
$2.95 million, paid by Verkada Inc. in 2024 over more than 30 million commercial emails sent with no functioning opt-out mechanism and no physical postal address.
Has the FTC gone after a company for disguising marketing emails as account notices?
Yes. Experian Consumer Services (ConsumerInfo.com) paid $650,000 in 2023 to settle FTC and DOJ claims over marketing emails disguised as account and transactional notices.
Can an agency avoid CAN-SPAM liability by using a client’s own list or sending tool?
No. CAN-SPAM liability cannot be outsourced to an ESP, a cold-email tool, or an agency partner. The business behind the campaign, and the agency acting as sender of record on its behalf, both carry exposure.
How many CAN-SPAM cases has the FTC brought overall?
Roughly 169 cases since the law’s 1999 passage, a commonly cited figure this research could not independently verify against a single directly loaded FTC page.
What specifically triggered the Verkada penalty?
No functioning opt-out mechanism, unsubscribe requests that went unhonored, and no physical postal address, across more than 30 million commercial emails sent over three years.

Compliance risk does not have to sit on your own domain.

Book a 15-minute call and see how Human + AI SDRs run new-business texting on VA Horizon’s own compliant system, not your agency’s exposed sending infrastructure.

Book a B2B Call

Pay per booked meeting · No retainer · Free no-show replacement

Recommended next steps