Skip to main content
VA Horizon
Book a Call
New-Business Pipeline

Why “We’ll Think About It” After a Strong Discovery Call Usually Isn’t About the Agency

Quick answer

When a prospect says “we’ll think about it” after a call that clearly went well, the data on how B2B purchases get made suggests it is frequently a literal, accurate description of what has to happen next, not a polite exit line. Buying-committee research commonly cited across the sales-research industry, traced to Gartner’s Future of Sales work and worth re-verifying against Gartner’s own original publication for an exact figure, puts a typical enterprise software purchase at around 11 stakeholders, with mid-market deals between $25,000 and $100,000 typically involving 4 to 7 people, and describes buying-group size nearly doubling in a decade, from an average of 5.4 stakeholders in 2015 to 8 to 13 in 2025.

Nearly 89% of B2B buying decisions cross multiple departments, and 74% of buying teams experience what the same secondary-aggregated research calls unhealthy conflict while deciding, figures also worth confirming against Gartner’s original publication rather than treating as footnoted precision data. Against that backdrop, how a rep responds to the stall matters: Gong’s analysis of 121,828 recorded B2B sales meetings found top-performing reps respond to an objection by asking a clarifying question 54.3% of the time, versus 31% for average reps, and pause roughly five times longer before responding at all.

The Buying Committee Behind One Reachable Contact

The person on a discovery call is rarely the only person who has to agree before an agency gets hired. Buying-committee benchmarks commonly cited across the sales-research industry, traced to Gartner’s Future of Sales research and worth re-verifying against Gartner’s own original publication for a precision figure, put a typical enterprise software purchase at around 11 stakeholders, with a more general rule of thumb of 6 to 10 people for a complex B2B purchase, and mid-market deals between $25,000 and $100,000 typically involving 4 to 7 people.

The same research describes that number climbing fast: buying-group size nearly doubled in a decade, from an average of 5.4 stakeholders in 2015 to 8 to 13 in 2025. A single reachable contact on a discovery call was never the whole story, and the trend line says that gap is widening, not closing.

What Cross-Departmental Reach and Internal Conflict Mean for a Stall

Nearly 89% of B2B buying decisions cross multiple departments, finance, IT, security, procurement, and the actual line-of-business owner, per the same secondary-aggregated Gartner-linked research, worth confirming against the original source before treating as a precision figure. That alone explains why a contact who loved the call still cannot say yes on the spot, they may need sign-off from people who were never on the call at all.

74% of buying teams reportedly experience what the research calls unhealthy conflict while deciding. A “let me think about it” is sometimes a preview of exactly that, the contact walking back into a room where finance, IT, and their own manager do not automatically agree with each other, let alone with the agency’s pitch.

Want this handled for you?

Pay per booked meeting for your industry. No retainer.

Book a B2B Call

Why Consensus Is Worth the Wait

The same body of research reports that buying teams who do reach consensus are 2.5x more likely to rate their own decision as high-quality. That is a real incentive for the delay a rep experiences as frustrating: a prospect taking the time to align a fractured committee is more likely to arrive at a decision that sticks, rather than a fast yes that unwinds a month later once someone who was never consulted objects.

None of this is a reason to stop following up. It is a reason to treat the wait itself as consistent with a real, multi-person process, not as evidence the call went worse than it felt.

What Top Reps Do Differently When They Hear the Stall

Gong’s analysis of 121,828 recorded B2B sales meetings found top-performing reps respond to an objection, including a stall like “we need to think about it,” by asking a clarifying question 54.3% of the time, compared with just 31% for average reps. Top performers also pause roughly five times longer than average reps before responding at all.

Both findings point the same direction: resisting the urge to immediately fill the silence with more selling, and asking instead, is what separates a rep who learns something useful from one who just adds noise to an already crowded internal conversation the prospect is about to walk back into.

The Objection-Handling Instinct Worth Retiring

The common scripted response to “we’ll think about it” pushes back immediately, restating value, offering a discount, or asking what specifically is holding them back, all before finding out anything real. Given the committee dynamics above, that instinct is often aimed at the wrong problem: the hesitation may have nothing to do with the agency at all, and everything to do with a colleague the rep has never met.

A better question, grounded in the data above, asks who else needs to be comfortable with this decision, not to pressure the contact, but to find out whether the real obstacle is even visible from the call the rep just had.

Turning a Stall Into Useful Information

Once “we’ll think about it” is read as a description of a real internal process rather than a rejection in disguise, the useful move is finding out who else is in that process before the deal goes quiet for good. That is a qualification question as much as a closing one, and it is more useful earlier than later.

Human + AI SDRs ask exactly that kind of question in the first SMS conversation, surfacing who else is involved before a discovery call ever lands on the calendar, instead of discovering the real committee for the first time at the stall.

Sources

The external data in this article draws on the sources below. Figures described in the text as estimates or industry triangulations are directional and are not attributed to a single dataset.

FAQ

Does “we’ll think about it” usually mean no?
Not necessarily. Buying-committee research commonly cited across the sales-research industry, traced to Gartner and worth re-verifying against its original publication, puts a typical B2B purchase at 6 to 11 stakeholders, so a genuine need to consult others is often the literal reason for the delay.
How many people are involved in a typical B2B purchase decision?
Commonly cited benchmarks, traced to Gartner’s Future of Sales research and worth confirming against the original publication, put enterprise software purchases around 11 stakeholders and mid-market deals between $25,000 and $100,000 at 4 to 7 people, up from an average of 5.4 in 2015.
Why do B2B buying teams experience so much internal conflict?
Nearly 89% of B2B buying decisions cross multiple departments, per secondary-aggregated research linked to Gartner, worth re-verifying for a precision figure, and 74% of buying teams reportedly experience what that research calls unhealthy conflict while deciding.
What should a rep say when they hear “we need to think about it”?
Gong’s analysis of 121,828 recorded B2B sales meetings found top-performing reps respond to an objection by asking a clarifying question 54.3% of the time, versus 31% for average reps, rather than immediately restating value or offering a discount.
Does pausing before responding to an objection help?
The same Gong research found top performers pause roughly five times longer than average reps before responding to an objection, giving the prospect room to say more before the rep reacts.

Qualify the committee before the stall happens.

Book a 15-minute call and see how Human + AI SDRs ask who else is involved in a decision before a discovery call ever lands on your calendar.

Book a B2B Call

Pay per booked meeting · No retainer · Free no-show replacement