Skip to main content
VA Horizon
Book a Call
Statistics

Win Rate Statistics for B2B SaaS by Deal Size and Multi-Threading 2026

Quick answer

Multi-threading, engaging more than one buyer-side contact, is associated with an average 130% win-rate lift in SaaS deals over $50,000, per Gong Labs’ analysis of 1.8 million B2B deals closed in 2024. Across that same dataset, 77% of deals are multi-threaded, but the deals that close successfully have roughly twice as many buyer contacts as the deals that do not.

Team composition tracks the same pattern: closed-won deals include an average of 6.7 members of the seller’s own team, 67% larger than the selling team on comparably staged deals that end up lost, and looping in a sales engineer or technical specialist for demos and technical questions is associated with up to a 30% win-rate lift.

Why This Page Leads With Deal Size, Not Lead Source

The original brief behind this page asked for win rate cut by lead source. No published research from Gong Labs, the strongest available named source for SaaS win-rate data, breaks results out by lead source specifically. What Gong’s own research does confirm, in detail, is win rate by deal size and by multi-threading, so this page is built on that confirmed cut instead of forcing a lead-source claim the underlying data does not support.

What Multi-Threading Does to Win Rate

Gong Labs analyzed 1.8 million B2B deals closed in 2024 and found multi-threading, engaging more than one buyer-side contact rather than relying on a single champion, associated with an average 130% win-rate lift in deals over $50,000. Across the full dataset, 77% of deals are multi-threaded, but the deals that close successfully have roughly twice as many buyer contacts as the ones that do not, meaning multi-threading itself is common, but doing enough of it is what separates a won deal from a lost one.

The pattern holds on the seller’s side of the table too. Closed-won deals include an average of 6.7 members of the seller’s own team, 67% larger than the selling team on comparably staged deals that end up lost, and large, strategic opportunities average 17 buyer-side contacts. Looping in a sales engineer or other technical specialist for demos and technical questions is associated with up to a 30% win-rate lift in the same dataset, real evidence that the right kind of team involvement, not just headcount, moves the number.

Multi-threading is not optional so much as structural. Gartner research, cited via Landbase’s own sales-statistics roundup, separately finds 87% of B2B buying groups now include four or more stakeholders, a committee size a single-contact deal simply cannot cover, which is part of why the deals with more buyer contacts above are the ones that close.

The Numbers

1

Multi-threading is associated with an average 130% win-rate lift in SaaS deals over $50,000.

Gong, analysis of 1.8 million B2B deals closed in 2024

2

77% of deals are multi-threaded, but the deals that close successfully have roughly twice as many buyer contacts as the deals that do not.

Gong, analysis of 1.8 million B2B deals closed in 2024

3

Closed-won deals include an average of 6.7 members of the seller’s own team, 67% larger than the selling team on comparably staged deals that end up lost.

Gong, analysis of 1.8 million B2B deals closed in 2024

4

Large, strategic opportunities average 17 buyer-side contacts.

Gong, analysis of 1.8 million B2B deals closed in 2024

5

Looping in a sales engineer or other technical specialist for demos and technical questions is associated with up to a 30% win-rate lift.

Gong, analysis of 1.8 million B2B deals closed in 2024

6

87% of B2B buying groups now include four or more stakeholders, a structural reason multi-threading has become the norm rather than the exception.

Landbase, 35 B2B Sales Statistics (citing Gartner’s Buying Groups research)

Sources

The external data in this article draws on the sources below. Figures described in the text as estimates or industry triangulations are directional and are not attributed to a single dataset.

FAQ

Is there SaaS win-rate data broken out by lead source?
No published research from Gong Labs, the strongest named source for this kind of data, breaks win rate out by lead source specifically. This page uses Gong’s confirmed cut instead: win rate by deal size and by multi-threading.
Does multi-threading improve win rate?
Yes. Gong Labs’ analysis of 1.8 million B2B deals closed in 2024 found multi-threading associated with an average 130% win-rate lift in deals over $50,000.
How common is multi-threading in SaaS deals?
77% of deals in Gong’s dataset are multi-threaded, but the deals that close successfully have roughly twice as many buyer contacts as the deals that do not, meaning doing enough of it matters more than doing any of it.
Do larger selling teams win more often?
Closed-won deals include an average of 6.7 members of the seller’s own team, 67% larger than the selling team on comparably staged deals that end up lost, per the same Gong dataset.
Does involving a sales engineer on a call change the outcome?
It correlates with a meaningfully better one. Looping in a sales engineer or technical specialist for demos and technical questions is associated with up to a 30% win-rate lift in Gong’s analysis.

Book meetings built to multi-thread.

Book a 15-minute call and see how Human + AI SDRs qualify more than one contact per account, the pattern the data above ties to winning deals.

Book a B2B Call

Pay per booked meeting · No retainer · Free no-show replacement

Recommended next steps